|
Beverly
Hills Bar Association -- Trusts & Estates Section
Litigation Update (since January 21, 2003)
Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Arai v. American Bryce Ranches Inc. (Jan. 21, 2003) (No. 01-56405)
Denial of motion to reopen time for appeal under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules
of Appellate Procedure was an abuse of discretion where moving party met the
technical requirements of the rule and sole ground for denial was district
judge's view that appeal lacked merit.
Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc. (Jan. 21, 2003) (No. 01-56728)
Denial of leave to amend complaint was an abuse of discretion where denial
was based on fact that there had been two prior amendments, even though
prior amendments added substantial detail to plaintiff's claims rather than
merely rehashing rejected allegations, plaintiffs alleged in apparent good
faith that evidence needed to satisfy statutory pleading requirements would
be forthcoming, and defendants failed to show prejudice.
California Court of Appeal
In re Marriage of Bellio (Jan. 21, 2003) (2nd Civil No. B156153,
Second District) Provision in premarital agreement requiring husband to pay
a lump sum to wife who waived any interest in husband's earnings and
accumulations and in his separate property upon divorce did not violate
public policy where sum was limited to approximate amount that wife would
lose as result of termination of spousal support from previous marriage.
Robinson Helicopter, Inc. v. Dana Corporation (Jan. 24, 2003)(B150963,
Second District) "Economic loss rule" bars plaintiff from recovering
punitive damages for alleged fraud resulting from performance of contract
rather than in the inducement.
Pederson v. Superior Court (Jan. 28, 2003)(B155839, Second District)
Penal Code Sec. 1367.1, which provides that if treatment under the
Lanterman Petris Short Act does not restore competence, a misdemeanor
defendant is subject to the same proceedings as is a felony defendant
thought to be incompetent to stand trial due to a mental disorder deprives
misdemeanor defendants of the equal protection of the laws, since a felony
defendant is not required to undergo evaluation and treatment under the LPS
Act prior to a competency determination.
Dodge, Warren & Peters Insurance Services, Inc. v. Riley (Feb. 5,
2003)(E031719, Fourth District) Trial judge has discretion to grant
injunction barring party from destroying, concealing, or altering materials
pending ruling on whether they are discoverable.
McMahon v. Superior Court (Feb. 7, 2003)(B162625, Second District)
Statute setting minimum notice of hearing on summary judgment motion makes
no provision for shortening time, nor does court's constitutional authority
to control its own docket permit it to shorten time in absence of
legislative authorization.
Note: For free online access to California Appellate and Supreme Court
decisions from 1934 to the present, go to
www.findlaw.com/cacases .
Registration is required.
|